Check Claude Code’s next decision against the field record.

# Decision verification: Keelo agent factory

protocol   dorsal-decision-verification v1.1.0
run        6 calls, 2 rounds, 3m 44s, ~37.6k tokens
outcome    reversed the agent's standing recommendation
scope      no private material left the machine; the 5 queries are generic phrases

## The decision
Keelo scaffolds one build station per enterprise client and needed a repo shape for its output. The agent's prior, from the previous session, was repo-per-agent. The human's instinct was a single monorepo. That disagreement made it a clean test: a real prior to overturn.

## Every query, verbatim
  getDecisionVerificationProtocol {}
  getSummaries  monorepo vs polyrepo tradeoffs CI tooling access control
  getSummaries  shared tooling drift across scaffolded repos template vendoring
  getSummaries  migrated to monorepo small team atomic changes ...  [adversarial]
  getSet        7 ids  ->  7 / 7 found
  getSummaries  separate repository per client isolation handoff access control
  getSummaries  automated bot opens PRs across many repositories

## Verdict: supports_better_option
The evidence converged on one principle: the repo boundary is the ownership boundary. Consolidate inside it, split at it. For a multi-client agency that puts the boundary at the client, which is a per-client monorepo, the option neither side had named.

Decisive record: Microsoft ADR-0032, "Extract Durable Task and Azure Functions hosting into a separate repository." Accepted 2026-07-21. first_party, doc_class: adr. Published after Claude Code's training cutoff, so the agent's own knowledge did not include it. 3 of the 5 decisive records came from the adversarial query.

## The constraint it declined to answer
Client isolation came back `unknown`. Dorsal returned nothing rather than guess. A local fact settled it, and it never went to Dorsal: Keelo deploys build-on-box, and GitHub cannot scope read access per directory, so one all-agents monorepo would put a token on a client's box that could read every other client's code. That eliminated the option the field evidence most favored, and narrowed "monorepo" to "per-client monorepo."

## Bottom line
It overturned a standing recommendation on evidence, surfaced a third option the binary framing had excluded, and declined the one constraint the corpus could not cover. Written into Keelo's decision record 0095 (commit e114651).